The US government, citing national security authorities, has issued an export control directive to suspend all access to Fable 5 and Mythos 5 by any foreign national, whether inside or outside the United States, including foreign national Anthropic employees. The net effect of this order is that we must abruptly disable Fable 5 and Mythos 5 for all our customers to ensure compliance.
We received the directive from the government today at 5:21pm (ET). The letter did not provide specific details of its national security concern. Our understanding is that the government believes it has become aware of a method of bypassing, or "jailbreaking" Fable 5. We reviewed a demonstration of this specific technique being used to identify a small number of previously known, minor vulnerabilities. These vulnerabilities all appear relatively simple, and we have found that other publicly-available models are able to discover them as well without requiring a bypass.
We stand by this defense in depth strategy. It reduces the risks posed by Fable, making them comparable to the risks of existing models already deployed across the industry. We have not even received a disclosure of a concerning non-universal potential jailbreak that led to a harmful result. The potential jailbreaks that have been disclosed to us are either entirely benign responses or are minor findings that provide no Mythos-specific uplift.
We are complying with the government's legal directive and are removing access to Fable 5 and Mythos 5 for all users. However, we disagree that the finding of a narrow potential jailbreak should be cause forrecalling a commercial model deployed to hundreds of millions of people. If this standard was applied across the industry, we believe it would essentially halt all new model deployments for all frontier model providers.
We disagree that the finding of a narrow potential jailbreak should be cause for recalling a commercial model.
我们不同意发现一个狭隘的潜在越狱应当成为召回商业模型的理由。
仿写练习:
We disagree that a single incident should be cause for _______ (修改整个政策).
参考答案:...should be cause for revising the entire policy.
Pattern 5: "If this standard was applied..., it would..." 虚拟语气
这是与现在事实相反的虚拟语气(Second Conditional),用来表达假设情况。结构:If + 过去式, ... would + 动词原形。
If this standard was applied across the industry, we believe it would essentially halt all new model deployments.
如果这一标准在全行业适用,我们认为它将基本上停止所有新模型部署。
仿写练习:
If every minor bug was treated as critical, it would _______ (使开发流程瘫痪).
参考答案:...it would paralyze the development process.
Comprehension Quiz
检验你对文章的理解。选择最佳答案。
Q1 · Factual Recall 事实回忆
Why did the US government issue the directive to suspend Fable 5?
Q2 · Vocabulary in Context 语境词汇
In the statement, what does "the net effect" mean?
Q3 · Inference 推理判断
Why did Anthropic disable Fable 5 for ALL customers, not just foreign nationals?
Q4 · Critical Thinking 批判性思考
What is Anthropic's main argument against the government's action?
Q5 · Tone Analysis 语气分析
How would you describe the overall tone of Anthropic's statement?
Writing Practice
用你从本课学到的词汇和句式,完成以下写作练习。
Exercise 1 · Email Response 邮件回复
Imagine you are a product manager at a tech company. Your team just received a government order to remove a feature from your product. Write a 100-word internal email to your team explaining the situation.
We have received a directive...to ensure compliancethe net effect is that...effective immediatelywe are working to resolve...
Exercise 2 · Opinion Paragraph 观点段落
Do you think a government should have the power to order a company to shut down an AI product? Write a short paragraph (80–120 words) giving your opinion.
你认为政府是否应该有权力命令一家公司关停AI产品?写一个80-120词的段落表达你的观点。
I believe that...on one hand... on the other hand...should be grounded inIf this standard was applied...defense in depthcomparable to
Exercise 3 · Vocabulary Application 词汇运用
Use at least 5 words from today's vocabulary list to write a short news summary (60–80 words) about a fictional AI company facing a similar situation.